Roman Economic Thought



Romans were the men of action. They built institutions that profoundly influenced the development of law and politics. They approached the economic problems of the day from the political standpoints; thus their specific contribution to economic thought is very little. Cicero commended the traditional roman virtue of public service. Though he did not possess original ideas, this statements became incomparably the most important single literary means for spreading them throughout Western Europe. He said that though all men were not equal in learning , yet in the possession of reason, in their psychological backstage and in their sentiment towards good or bad they were alike. To him, equality was  a moral requirement and state , a moral community or corporate body which existed to supply its mean less the advantages of mutual aid and just government. There consequence follow from these observations:-
a) Since state in the common property of people , it’s authority arises from their collective power.
b) Political power when exercised rightfully and lawfully becomes the corporate power of people.
c) State is always subject  to the law of God or to moral or natural law.
To Seneca, it was the moral duty of a good man to offer his services in some capacity or the other. He considered society more important than state. A good man renders services to humanity even though he has no political power. He does so by piety of his moral  kinship to follows. According to him , a man who by virtue of his thought becomes the teacher of mankind fills a place nobler and more influential than the political ruler. Seneca’s thought tended towards humanitarianism. Agriculture, Cato, Varro, Pliny,  Columella and Paladius praised agriculture and were chiefly interested in the improvement of agriculture technique. They favored small scale farming and decried the maintenance of large estates which were worked by slave labor. Cato regarded an agricultural estate of 150 acres of olive groves and 62 acres of vine-yards as the ideal one. Varro advised crop growing and stock breeding. All of them supported the back to nature movement to increase food production and wrote semi-technical books on rural economy. According to the Pedius, the prices of things were  discerned neither with reference to fill, nor to their utility to single individuals, but had a common validity. They did not develop their ideas on value. According to them, price was determined by the forces of demand and supply. In due course of time the concept of just price developed which showed some regard for ethical considerations. They also recognized the importance of wants and utility but not as a potential factor. Cicero observed that the only limit to the valuation of such things was the desire which anyone had for them for it was difficult to limit price unless desire was first limited. Thus Roman state interfered with economic matters and commercial regulations in difficult times. Fines were imposed on merchants who had stored up food grains in the expectation of high prices, Officers were appointed to inspect the goods which were put on sale and the entire quantity was confiscated if a fraud was detected. The Exportation of precious metals was banned. Instances of traffic regulation are not wanting. In times of financial stringency the Government established a public bank to assist professional bankers.